Edit text of this page (date of last change: March 22, 2007 17:41 (diff))

P2 PMoney

Difference (last change) (no other diffs, normal page display)

Added: 46a47,50
=== Organized Inquiry =

P2PMoneyOrganizedInquiry creating questions that help focus our P2PMoney research, and summarizing the answers from many different sources.


  • info:This page is designed to coordinate efforts of people interested in developing a tool so that groups of individuals can jointly manage money they decide to pool together.
We are trying to combine the needs and interests of BarCampBank to create a tool to jointly manage pooled money, with the needs and interests of Open Business Models wiki hive, which is looking to create a Revenue Sharing money manegement tool, and can also use an open source based money pooling tool. This was originally described in CoDevProposal.

Requirements

Here is a short list of requirement extracted from the P2PMoneyDiscussion.

A pooled payment system would:

  1. Offer a place where pledges for money can be stored and easily committed
  2. Offer a way for the group to define different future expenses, vote for prioritization and approval.
  3. Offer a way to make direct payment to the vendor in the case of a large payment
  4. Offer a way to enter, track, approve past expenses incurred by different participants or consolidate and re-assign shares of a common revenue.
  5. Offer a way to transfer cash from one or several of the participant to one or several other participants, either for reimbursing past expenses or for distributing earned revenues
A Revenue sharing module for this system would:

  1. work flexibly with Project Point systems, wherein points earned represent shares of revenue.
  2. Allow direct mass payment to project participants from vendor/reseller sources, like Cafepress, for instance, and also would accept payment from hosted ecommerce sites/shopping carts. Also would distribute money from bank accounts, paypal.
  3. Would also allow projects to divide revenue using pre-assigned percentage shares instead of project points, if they choose to do so.
  4. Would allow projects that use point systems to have a "what if system" showing a projected revenue earned based on tasks done and points earned and current total incoming revenue.
A quick diagram displaying the hoped for functions. source is here

Core module should send and recieve payments, sub modules should be developed towards money pooling/expense tracking, and revenuel sharing/project points systems, but both interface with core payment send and recieve module. Drupal-based. -- SamRose

High Level Architecture

This is a current representation of our current conceptualization of the HighLevelArchitecture of server and script technology for the proposed tool:

diagram by FredericBaud, based on P2PMoney discussions.

Organized Inquiry

P2PMoneyOrganizedInquiry creating questions that help focus our P2PMoney research, and summarizing the answers from many different sources.

Related Links

CoDevProposal

Discussion

Moved to P2PMoneyDiscussion

The aim of BarCampBank is to foster innovations and the creation of new business models in the world of banking and finance.

BarCampBank WorkGroups

HashTagMobileMoney
HashTagMoney
TwitBank
Twollars

Main Contributors (girls first)

AnneCarolinePaucot
BlandineMouren
ClaireUlrich
CharlesNepote
ChristopheDucamp
EisoKant
EmmanuelGadenne
glenux
HelmutLeitner
LaurentLunati
MarcTirel
RobertVinet
SamRose
TwollarsGang
WangXiang
WilliamHill

... add your name

BarCampBank AbsorptionGroups

BankingVRM

Neighbourhood
WikiNode

Wiki-platform

HelmutLeitner ProWiki FractalWiki

feedburner logo