Edit text of this page (date of last change: February 26, 2007 11:09 (diff))
Discussion
Discussion moved to Enterprise Profile
Discussion
Discussion moved to Investment Size Discussion
Discussion
Discussion moved to Standard Investor Profile Discussion
Discussion
Discussion moved to Debt vs Equity Discussion
Should P2PVenture be global, mutli-currency from the start? Most probably because of legal issues, the different "instances" of P2PVenture could be started in different spaces (e.g. working in $ in the US; working in $ in the Euroland, in selected Western-European countries, in national euro-market because of local regulations or difference in business culture; in ¥ in Japan;...)
The question is if P2PVenture will cover certain deals that are currently handled by banks of VCs but do it in a more efficient way that these institutions do for these type of deals (and why it is more efficient should be very clearly explained). Or will it provide investments in an economical way to enterprises that are currently out of the loop and opportunities for investors' money that currently are offered unattractive returns?
Discussion
Discussion moved to Disruption or Lower Discussion
Discussion
Discussion moved to P2PVenture Plaftform Compensation Model
|
A BarCampBank Workgroup